Would it not consume more memory, the more vds's you have? On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Rob Farr <rob.farr at sun.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Sorry if I didn't make it clear with the *maybe* I did mean to stress that > it's a very very unlikely. > > Rob > > > >> >> On 03/08/10 15:18, Rob Farr wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> No performance advantage and you use up another LDC. >>> >>> The only possible advantage I can think of is if the vds hung >>> due to some unknown bug. Then *maybe* the other vds would be ok. >>> >> >> That's very unlikely because each vdisk exported by vds has its own >> ldc/structure/threads. >> >> alex. >> >> >> Are there any advantages or disadvantages to having multiple disk >>>> devices? >>>> >>>> For example, typically people just create one vds, i.e. primary-vds0. >>>> >>>> Is there any benefit to having one per guest LDom, or even one per-disk? >>>> >>>> One SA at a client was creating one per disk, per LDom, for example: >>>> >>>> ldom1-vol0 - root disk0 >>>> ldom1-data-vol0 - app data disk 1 >>>> ldom1-data-vol2 - app data disk 2 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Brian >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ldoms-discuss mailing list >>>> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ldoms-discuss mailing list >>> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > ldoms-discuss mailing list > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ldoms-discuss/attachments/20100308/c3e2a620/attachment.html>
