Using dd is not a got way to evaluate performances. dd does sequential
serialized I/Os, and this is the worst case scenario for vdisk. With real
applications, most your disk I/Os will be multiple parallel random I/Os
(done by the filesystem) so this is definitively not what dd is testing.

 A better way to test I/Os is to use vdbench, with which you can simulate
different type of workload. But the best test is to run your applications,
and see how it behaves and if you have unexpected response time.

alex.

On 06/10/10 03:01, Tom Kuther wrote:
We have seen the same problem on a T5220, LDOMs 1.3, 8 internal 10k SAS drives 
and ZFS all around.

Even on the ZFS RAID1 ldompool inside the control domain, I couldn't get over 
46MB/s with dd testing. Same for the 6-disk RAIDz inside the guest LDOM 
(exported slice 2 of EFI labeled disk, formed into RAIDZ)

I deleted all LDOM configs and rebooted factory-default, same tests reveal  
around 100MB/s on the same ldompool now, and about 90MB/s for the RAIDZ,

So now we end up using zones instead.

(Originally posted on sun forums: 
http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5441479)
_______________________________________________
ldoms-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss
  • [ldoms-discuss... Tony MacDoodle
    • Re: [ldom... John
      • Re: [... Tony MacDoodle
        • R... Nathan Kroenert
        • R... John
          • ... Tom Kuther
            • ... Alexandre Chartre
              • ... Tom Kuther
                • ... Stefan Hinker - Systems Practice - Sun Microsystems Germany
              • ... Nathan Kroenert
                • ... Stefan Hinker - Systems Practice - Sun Microsystems Germany
                • ... Tony MacDoodle
                • ... Octave Orgeron
                • ... Ashutosh Tripathi

Reply via email to