Bill, I've been meeting with the team in charge of the MLS to see what
exactly we can open up to the community for development. Good ideas!
Tom
Bill Pringle wrote:
The church doesn't need to understand open source methodology in order
to take advantage of it, but they do have to be open to the idea of
people writing whatever they believe is helpful, rather than
controlling what the end results are. At present, the preference is
to tell us what information we need and how we should update it.
For example, if the format of the MLS database were published so that
we could write third party programs to extract information and create
whatever reports, various people feel they need, that would be a great
help. By providing an import feature that makes it easy for people to
work on their PCs at home and then apply a series of changes would
make life easier for EQ, HP, and RS presidents to maintain their HT/VT
lists. Last Sunday we had a line waiting to get into the MLS system
to update/print whatever people wanted, but somebody was updating
their HT assignments, which used up most of the available time.
I rewrote my wardlist program (that worked with MIS) to handle the
exports from MLS, and renamed it MLSRpt. It provides a number of
reports that you can't get from MLS, but I need to extract the
information, take it home, run my program, and then distribute the
reports. This is because the export information contains sensitive
information (e.g., ages for adults) that can't be distributed to the
general congregation. If I knew the format of the MLS database, I
could provide some programs that members could run to get the
information they need without revealing any information they shouldn't
have.
Although the old MIS system was a clunker, it was easy to write
screen-scraping software to extract all the information and reformat
it. With MLS that is much harder to do. While the Export feature
made much of my life easier, the fact that some helpful information
isn't available via export (like HT/VT visits) means that some
information is much harder to get now.
When I was exec sec, I had most of the information that was needed for
Bishopric, Welfare, etc. When a name came up, people would look to me
to tell them what callings they had, who their HT/VT are, how much
they have been visited, who they HT/VT and how often they visited
their people, etc. This kind of information was very helpful to
determine how best to serve that person and/or address any problem. I
made these reports available to those who were authorized and
interested in text or PDA forms (using MMS).
---
Bill Pringle
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.unisysfsp.com
http://www.unisys.com
home/school: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.personal.psu.edu/~wrp103
http://CherylWheeler.com
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
--
Tom Welch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(801) 240-1609
(858) 829-4614 - Cell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
