At 01:21 PM 11/22/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
>Mike Sensney wrote:
>> I was thinking that it would be a good idea to invite Matthew in as a LEAF
>> developer. He developed the mountain series. I personally would like to see
>> him continue his development work if he is willing.
><Matt Grant's post snipped>
>
>What gives you the idea that he would be willing? He wasn't
>willing to do it when it was called LRP; I don't think that
>legitimizing it additionally will help at all.
>
>However...it can't hurt to ask, not one bit...unless he bytes. ;)
Personally, I'd love to see Matthew become active again, whether under the
name LRP, LEAF, Everest, or something entirely new. Substance is what
counts, and he delivered substance for an awfully long time.
My impression from the message of Matthew's that Mike quoted was that
Matthew was looking for a graceful way out of continued LRP development.
Like any normal person, his interests and focuses would change over time.
But who cares what I think? What matters is what Matthew thinks. LEAF is by
design pretty open to anyone interested in being active.
So by all means, Mike (Sensney), get in touch with Matthew and see if he is
interested. If he is, I'm sure Mike (Noyes) would be faster than a speeding
bullet adding him to the team.
--
------------------------------------"Never tell me the odds!"---
Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo
Palo Alto, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel
