<x-flowed>It looks like they are actively looking at putting UPX in initrd, which 
would be useful for LRP. It would be a relatively small step to go from 
there to using UPX on all LRP packages. (tar.upx format vs. tar.gz)

 From a previous post:

Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:08:39 -0800
From: John Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LRP-dev] tighter compression for Linux kernels
 > > Beta release v1.11 of the UPX executable compressor http://upx.tsx.org
 > > offers new, tighter re-compression of compressed Linux kernels for x86.
 >
 > How about kernel modules?
We're looking at applying UPX to initial ram disk (initrd) and/or cramfs.
Suggestions, comments, etc. are welcome.
-- 
John Reiser, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
linux-router-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxrouter.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-router-devel
At 09:32 AM 12/28/2000 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>On 28 Dec 2000, at 14:31, Kenneth Hadley wrote:
>
> > its my opinion that upx would be very usefull on LRP kernels but a hit
> > and miss afair on LRP packages (it may help in certain cases but its
> > up to the packager of the program)
>
>You may be right.
>
> > anyone have any thoughts?
>
>I experimented myself, though not with Linux kernels.  UPX is an
>executable compressor; when you create a package, the files are
>combined (with tar) and compressed with gzip.  Thus, a compressed
>executable is being compressed AGAIN - which leads typically to no
>space savings or more space being used (instead of less).  This is
>normal for compression of compressed files.
>
>The best thing I can see is that UPX will save memory space - if your
>requirements require a 16M machine, then UPX will help in those
>situations.  If your requirements require 1.44M disks, you won't get
>any help from UPX :-)
>
>It sounds like UPX may help in compressing the kernels, though.
>Hmmmm.....
>
>--
>David Douthitt
>UNIX Systems Administrator
>HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>linux-router-devel maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.linuxrouter.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-router-devel


_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>

Reply via email to