<x-flowed>At 10:06 AM 1/19/01 -0600, "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just wanted to say - having seen several SourceForge sites, I
>would say that the LEAF page is one of the few well documented
>pages, with LOTS of documentation. Let's give everyone a pat on
>the back, especially the writers and compilers - and especially
>Chief SourceForge Guru :) Mike Noyes!
David,
Thanks, no one ever called me a guru before. I don't know what I did to
deserve it, but thanks. Your the one that needs to be thanked. David,
thanks for all of your hard work on Oxygen, and other work. The
contributions from all of the project participants is greatly appreciated. :-)
>I also noticed that our activity is at 79% - not shabby! Of course,
>for comparison, the Tiny COBOL page is at 0% :)
Unfortunately, the stats are broken. They haven't worked for a couple of
months. The SourceForge staff is working on it. That means the Tiny COBOL
project may be doing better than you think. :)
https://sourceforge.net/project/stats/?group_id=13751
Current SourceForge Service Status Report
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1
~ STATS: As you all know, they're completely broken. We are
~ approaching this from two directions.
~
~ The first is to get the current cruft back up. The person
~ responsible for this is currently working on the issue and we hope
~ to have an ETA followed by a fix shortly.
~
~ The second way we are addressing this is to do a complete overhaul
~ of the stats system, which fundamentally does not scale the way we
~ want and is error-prone. This is the *real* fix, and should be much
~ more robust and statistics that are more accurate. We now have the
~ logging module we needed and will be testing it.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>
