On 25 Apr 2001, at 21:02, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: > Is the only choice between Scylla (vi-mode) and Charybdis (wasting disk > space)? e3ws, e3vi, e3ne, e3em, et al, are just links to e3; in Oxygen you need to be careful as the actual binary is e3.bin, with a shell wrapper and all the links point to e3.bin. Anyway, the lack or presence of backup files is a compile-time option for e3; you can set it or not. The vi emulation is built into e3, as are the others. The setting should be valid for all emulations. -- David Douthitt UNIX Systems Administrator HP-UX, Unixware, Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress George Metz
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchdörfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchdörfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchdörfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchdörfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchdörfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress ssrat
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchdörfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress ssrat
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress ssrat
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchdörfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress ssrat
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher