David Douthitt wrote:

>Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>[I wrote:]
>
>>>>It's that way now, but I've just a few things to tidy up.  The last
>>>>file I used this on was SING, and it worked well.  I'm putting
>>>>documentation into the Makefile, and more.
>>>>
>
>[Ewald replied:]
>
>>I still have to do so. Automatic creation of a mypackage.version file
>>comes to mind.
>>
>
>There's no way to make this totally automatic, as the version number
>could be anywhere - or nowhere.  Many archive names are of the form
><name>-<version>.tar.gz; some are of the form <name>-current.tar.gz;
>and some are just <name>.tar.gz.  Source code directories are like
>this, too.  So are binaries; some don't list the version at all; some
>list the version only if requested.
>
OK, you're right about that.

>
>I've got a working Makefile, but there are some things I'd really like
>to get in:
>
>* Single location specification of source files - right now, they are
>specified in three places at least.
>* Automatic incorporation of specially created files, such as help
>files and configuration files.
>* Some kind of record of the compilation options.  Is this a rules
>fule?  Dunno....
>
Doesn't really matter if it's a "rules" file does it? I can't wait to 
see the result.

Ewald Wasscher



_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to