Ewald Wasscher wrote: > > David Douthitt wrote: > >I've been compiling busybox these days under Red Hat 6.2 using > >egcs-2.90.29 (egcs release 1.0.3). Perhaps I should upgrade? > That's up to you of course, but if your current compiler works properly > (I thought your segfualt issues were solved), I'd say keep it. One more > reason to do so is that newer versions of gcc seem to produce larger > binaries. Compiling with -Os often helps against that, but not always. The segmentation violations are solved; a new Oxygen version launch is imminent.... _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress ssrat
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress KP Kirchd�rfer
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress ssrat
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress Mike Noyes
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress David Douthitt
