> Here are my questions (direct and to the point :-)
>
> 1. Is Eigerstein (or Dachstein) going to upgrade to a new version of
> glibc?
No. For clarity, if nothing else, Eigerstein, Dachstein, and any other
direct decendants will stick with the 'old' glibc.
> 2. Is LRP likely to upgrade to a new version of glibc?
Who knows/cares <sigh>...I think it was Dave C's intention to go to 2.[12]
and a 2.4 kernel with Butterfly...
I think any new LEAF based projects should/will use a newer glibc. I have
no real preference between 2.1 and 2.2, although I'd probably use the latest
assuming there's no huge size penalty or other problems.
> 3. What is your opinion: is compiling against glibc 2.0 worth the
> trouble? Or should everyone migrate their packages to glibc 2.1 or 2.2?
I think packages will begin to be compiled against whatever new glibc
version is used in various distributions...
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
