Am Dienstag, 12. März 2002 15:34 schrieb Mike Noyes: > At 2002-03-11 22:37 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: > >On 3/11/02 at 10:42 PM, Manfred Schuler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >wrote: > > > Today I received this security announcements. > > > If you think, it is not necessary to forward this message > > > to the list, please tell me. > > > >Should we (as distribution creators) be sending out our own > > "Official Vendor Security Alerts"? Sounds logical to me... > > David, > Our leaf-announce list [1] is supposed to be used for security > alerts. We also have a Security task [2] that can be used for > tracking security updates. No one, including me, is using either of > these resources for security alerts/tracking. > > [1] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-announce > [2] > http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?group_project_id=5260&group_id=1 >3751 > > Is there another method you suggest we use?
As users of leaf-cvs-commit might know, I've updated libz.lrp. It's currently in the cvs tree of kapeka. This only could be a temporary solution. We definitely need two more cvs repositories: packages - for packages usable with glibc 2.0.x and glibc 2.1.3 packages-glibc 2.1.3 for packages compiled with glibc 2.1.3 (due to various reasons). Most packages are running on each LEAF version, therefor the current repositories mainly divided into developers and /bin/LEAF version are too restricted. thanks kp _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
