Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >>He suggested finding an unused line on a UART. Typical routers don't use >>their parallel ports for much, so I suppose you could toggle a bit on the >>parport (I remember suggesting to Mike that Charles would be able to >>consider the feasibility of this idea, based on his work with > > parallel-port > >>LCDs). And I2C might be able to do this too ... I don't really know about >>that one. >> >>That said, it still *sounds* like software WP, even though there is a >>hardware element involved. If the remote connection is compromised, then > > so > >>is security. He suggested you could find or create a protocol with >>acceptably low risk of compromise ... but if this were true as a general >>matter, we wouldn't be worrying about system penetrations, right? > > > Right. It's still software based write-protection, and someone with full > access to the box can reverse engineer the setup pretty easily.
Ok I get it now. I should have read this before my last question a minute or two ago. Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
