On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:56:00 +0100 Jacques wrote: > Le Mardi 14 Janvier 2003 17:37, Brad Fritz a écrit : > > Looks like many (or all?) of the Bering 2.4.20 modules [..] > > are not stripped. Was that intentional? [..]
> Hi Brad > Your suggestion would indeed save space but I would not recomment it. > It will work for some modules, won't for some others. > It would have to tested case by case because doing so globally you might be > stripping symbols needed for relocation and/or modules parameters. That is > what I rembered from some experiments I did along this line some months ago. > So it's probably safer to leave that option to the end user (some lines > could be added along these lines in the modules section of the install guide) > > with a strip.lrp package. > strip with --strip-unneeded flag would be safer but would save less space. I did not realize that some of the symbols in kernel modules where necessary for everything to work properly. My testing was pretty limited (just the 3c509 module). Thank you for the explanation. --Brad ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
