Am Montag, 15. November 2004 23:32 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Angelacos wrote:
> >Thanks for all the positive feedback on webconf so far.  There is
> > a suggestion that webconf.lrp (core) be just a weblet
> > replacement, and the current "expert" menu set be moved into
> > webconf.lwp.
> >
> >The reason is situations where an admin wants to give a customer
> > "read-only" rights to web pages for monitoring; but the customer
> > shouldn't have access to "fix" [pronounced: break] the installed
> > router.
> >
> >This makes sense to me; it means webconf.lrp is the replacement
> > for weblet; webconf.lwp is the value-add for most
> > "do-it-yourself" SOHO users; and extra .lwp's add further
> > functionality.
> >
> >Here's a proposed breakup of the existing webconf.lrp (beta 2)
> >
> >keyboard.lwp  -> keyboard.cgi (basic menu set)
> >dropbear.lwp  -> dropbear.cgi (basic menu set)
> >webconf.lwp   -> lrcfg.cgi (expert configuration pages)
> >              -> lrcfg.pkgdisks.cgi ("Destinations")
> >              -> leafcfg.cgi (Edit leaf.cfg )
> >webconf.lrp   -> (all the framework, lib, css, etc)
> >              -> connection-info.cgi ( Active Connections)
> >              -> general-info.cgi (General Health)
> >              -> logfiles.cgi (Log Files)
> >              -> lrcfg.back.cgi (Backup Packages)
> >              -> wc-passwd.cgi (Webconf password)
>
> Wouldn't you think dropbear.cgi and keyboard.cgi belong to
> dropbear.lwp and keyboard.lwp, especially for keyboard-less boxes.
>
Hi Erich;

maybe I do not understand, maybe you made a typo - but that's what 
proposes IMHO.

kp


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to