On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 12:32, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > | Are we interested in participating in SourceForge's Subversion Beta? > > Probably. > > Subversion is likely better than CVS for our needs, if only for the reason > that it *NEVER* modifies files, even if you forget to tag them as binary > (since the bulk of our CVS repository is binary tar.gz and iso files).
Charles, Ok. I'll sign us up, unless someone has an objection. The SF staff needs to know our decision by Wednesday 4 January. > I've been using subversion for quite a while for several internal > development projects (including versioning custom binary file formats from > CAD tools), and have had no problems with it. It's pretty much a superset > of CVS, so it's easy to migrate to. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
