>The document is valid. It just built successfully today. You probably
>specified the wrong dtd version, or have xml catalog issues. The other
>possible issue is xincludes. Regardless, the xml docbook _set_ is 
>valid.

I don't know XML.  That makes no sense to me.

>PDF generation was part of our old documentation build process. It did
>work, but wasn't what I'd call acceptable. The wiki install was in my

It wasn't.  It didn't handle long lines properly.

>I'm don't quite understanding your meaning. HTML is generated daily by
>doc-build.sh. Are you asking for a tarball?

YES!  Just tar up what's online and drop it where we can get it.

>> Thanks again for the wonderful work you put into this project, Mike!
>I don't know if I do much wonderful work anymore, but thanks for the
>compliment.

I second that.  I wouldn't feel safe without Bering 1.2.


Paul Rogers  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL 
:-)


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to