Hi Folks let me please chime in
Mike Noyes wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 01:38, Eric Spakman wrote: >> Ok, but back to the documentation issue. BU will always use the latest >> stable shorewall version and even with an older version of BU it shouldn't >> be a big problem to update to the latest shorewall (especially 3.0 >> onwards). Why duplicate the shorewall documentation on the LEAF site? >> Isn't it much simpler to just provide a link to Tom's documentation? I suggest to build html pages from the shorewall documentation which could be inserted on demand using shorwall.lwp for those who run webconf. I personally liked the documentation within the config files, as they provided most of what I always needed. I have never looked into the size of the man command, it might also be nice to provide a man.lrp package for those with enough space. cheers Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
