On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 16:28 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 09:13 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote:
> >>> The 2.6 kernel is that large, that a runnable _and_ useful floppy
> >>> version in the way we provided it with the kernel 2.4- based versions
> >> I'm not sure I understand why someone wants a 2.6 kernel to run a
> >> standalone LEAF/Bering firewall.  Can't find an old box and needs
> >> the hardware support for a box that's entirely too powerful?  ;-)
> > 
> > Paul,
> > Back-ports to 2.4 kernel aren't a long term solution. Kernel 2.4
> > (2.4.36) development effectively stopped in 2008. The same reasoning
> > goes for all the packages that LEAF variants use. It's time to join the
> > 2.6 crowd.
> 
> Right, still I would like to opt to at least try to upgrade the kernel
> and the security relevant packages to an actual level of 2.4 for all
> that still would like to use the 2.4 branch. I am just about to
> integrate the latest 2.4 OpenSwan into my stack, next thing will be to
> move to 2.4.37.9 with the kernel. Also Openvpn and openssl is some way
> off the latest LEAF collection.

Erich,
I have no problem with those goals. I don't see one development path
excluding others. Options are desirable, and encouraged under our
project's development model. Just look at our old derivation map. 

Branch Derivation
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=2

Predicting which path is desirable in hind site is easy. You need
something like a prediction market to make correct forecasts. That's why
I tend to favor multiple overlapping SCRUMs, and let the community
(users & developers) pick desired direction.

Prediction market
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market
Scrum (development)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrum_%28development%29

-- 
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects:  leaf, sourceforge/sitedocs


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to