Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 16:27:52 schrieb Andrew:
> 09.11.2010 00:41, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Every other, possible intrusive, change should IMHO better moved to 4.1 -
> > let's make use of Trac to not forget our plans and ideas.
> > 
> > jm2c
> > kp
> 
> IMHO we need to do some small modifications to base system  before
> freezing it - at least, today I discovered that busybox's modprobe can
> load modules with parameters if they are specified into
> /etc/modules/<module_name> - this is very suitable for NICs and so on.
> Unfortunatelly, current distro has file named /etc/modules - so that
> feature can't be used. IMHO we need to replace it's name to, for ex.,
> modules.conf.

This is definitely something which is important, if that's the only way to 
support modules parameter.

> Also I doubt against /etc/default directory, that contains config for
> init.d scripts - possible we must rename it to /etc/conf.d - like in
> other modern Debian-based distros and distros with Debian roots?

I vote against for two reasons:
First and not that important it's still /etc/default in current Debian stable 
and it's also /etc/default in Ubuntu and derivates - so we are in good 
neighborhood.
Second and more important, I don't see a real benefit other than just looking 
"modern". As an embedded distro we don't have the need and capabilities to be 
on par with the big ones. Our target is to be rock-solid and to work for years 
without attendance if possible. Easying deployment and updates will be more 
than enough for LEAF users. The naming of directories is less important.

Third it will break  a lot packages.

SF was pretty slow today, It took more 24hrs to build everything for 
testing...

kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a 
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your 
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to