15.11.2010 14:25, e-mail dmb.leaf-devel пишет:
> On 14 November 2010 21:29, Andrew<ni...@seti.kr.ua>  wrote:
>> 14.11.2010 23:15, davidMbrooke пишет:
>>> On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew wrote:
>>>> 13.11.2010 12:24, davidMbrooke пишет:
>>>>> On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 11:11 +0200, Andrew wrote:
>>>>>> 12.11.2010 20:24, davidMbrooke пишет:
>>>>>>> I see that we are using "CONFIG_MODPROBE_SMALL" rather than
>>>>>>> "CONFIG_MODPROBE" for BusyBox. Is there a good reason for that? Would
>>>>>>> switching to CONFIG_MODPROBE be a practical option?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     From comparing the source code (modprobe.c versus 
>>>>>>>> modprobe-small.c) it
>>>>>>> seems to me that modprobe.c would give us (more) standard Debian
>>>>>>> behaviour...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dMb
>>>>>> As I remembered, standard modprobe requires presence of System.map (file
>>>>>> with kernel symbols) which has huge size. But I can mistake.
>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it fairly easy to check on that?
>>>>>
>>>>> I will soon be off-line until tomorrow, and I know you wanted a quick
>>>>> answer on this, so my thinking is:
>>>>>
>>>>>       - If CONFIG_MODPROBE is a practical option (e.g. no need for
>>>>> System.map) then I would prefer to change to that.
>>>>>
>>>>>       - If CONFIG_MODPROBE is *not* a practical option I am OK with
>>>>> patching BusyBox - kp convinced me :-)
>>>>>
>>>> Best way - to look in code, or to assemble bb, copy it somewhere on
>>>> running distro, and run in's modprobe.
>>> I finally got chance to try this. I rebuilt everything from scratch (I
>>> was due a rebuild anyway) and changed the BusyBox .config to select
>>> CONFIG_MODPROBE rather than CONFIG_MODPROBE_SMALL. Everything seems to
>>> work fine, and no need for System.map.
>>>
>> If it works good and nothing is broken - you can commit it into main
>> tree :)
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I won't promise that *nothing* is broken, but everything I tried works OK.
> I will commit when I get home from work (+6 hours from now).
Mainly from this option dependent module autoloading at boot, hardware 
autodetection and software that can load modules by itself like iptables
> I have been reading some more. Seems that "_SMALL" saves 14KB. I think
> we can spare 14KB to use non-SMALL... :-)
>
Yes, of course.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture
Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using
Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end
client virtualization framework. Read more!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to