On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:55 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2010, 12:40:41 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > Hi, > > > > I keep wishing we had "ldd" as part of Bering-uClibc. > > > > Turns out this already gets built as part of uClibc: source code is > > source/buildenv/uClibc-0.9.30.3/utils/ldd.c, executable is > > staging/bin/ldd (only 10KB, even when not stripped). > > > > I suppose I could create a separate package for it, but probably it > > could go into an existing package. Would adding it to root.lrp be a good > > choice? > > Hi David; > I prefer to keep the basic stuff clean and also assume that some other > programs > will be requested sooner or later in the category > diagnostic/debbuging/developement. So I suggest to collect those in a > seperate > lrp. > > kp
Hi kp, OK. I respect that preference & agree that "ldd" is mainly a development / debug tool. Now we have the problem of naming the new .lrp though :-) How about: diag.lrp "Diagnostic and debugging tools" ? dMb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
