18.12.2010 18:45, davidMbrooke пишет: > On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 23:12 +0200, Andrew wrote: >> 11.12.2010 23:02, davidMbrooke пишет: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just had an enquiry about some work I did in 2007/2008 on using >>> Bering-uClibc 3.x as an NFS file server (hence the recent uploads to my >>> "devel" branch of CVS). >>> >>> I am wondering about adding support for NFS to Bering-uClibc 4.x. We >>> already have the kernel modules enabled (CONFIG_NFSD=m etc.) but we do >>> not have "full" RPC support built into uClibc, without which those >>> modules are little use. >>> This is easy to add, a one-line change: "UCLIBC_HAS_FULL_RPC=y". >>> >>> Any comments about whether it would be good / bad to make that change to >>> uClibc? >>> >>> davidMbrooke >> I think that it should be not so heavy (possible some tens of kb) - so >> if it will not break anything, IMHO it should be enabled. > Hi Andrew, > > I have now checked the file sizes Before and After this change: > > With "# UCLIBC_HAS_FULL_RPC is not set" > 244216 staging/lib/libuClibc-0.9.30.3.so > > With "UCLIBC_HAS_FULL_RPC=y" > 260664 staging/lib/libuClibc-0.9.30.3.so > > The difference is 16448 bytes, 6%. I think we can live with that. > > dMb > > Yes, of course, it isn't too high for distro that is oriented mostly on systems with 32-64M or more RAM. Even on minimal 16M this isn't too much.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
