16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
>> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>
>
>>> Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine and can provide patches that
>>> makes it seamless, I for shure won't oppose :)
>>>
>>> kp
>> git mv should do all job without problems. If nobody has objections -
>> IMHO we should move all on top.
> What will change for my local git? What has to be changed in the docs?
>
Just removed 'bering-uclibc4' into path
>> P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more
>> useful places for them (file archive/FTP/etc)? Git is more oriented for
>> source distribution/versioning...
> PLS don't change it! The current release process is the work of day; and it
> relies on the binaries being in git. I do not want to deal with file archive 
> or
> ftp on SF more than necessary.
>
> kp
Ok.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to