On 25/09/12 20:18, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi all; > > the x86 version of the upcoming 5.0 version runs quite well in > production for a few months. > The buildtool issues related to latest changes are solved and building > for x86 shows "green" for every package. > So I think the x86 is ready to prepare a release - anyone disagree about > x86? Hi. I think that we should do at least one thing before release - move initmod into separate package from initrd, and remove initrd dependency for kernel. This is trivial change, and this will help in future for embedded platforms where initrd may be integrated into kernel.
Also, how about David's port for Raspberry Pi? He haven't time to commit his work, or there is some troubles with right realization of cross-build for different arch (for ex. applying of platform-specific patches)? > But I tried to run buildall.sh with the toolchain set to > > Toolchain = armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk > > as a test for the work to support other architectures. > Unfortunately it fails while building the kernel sources with the error > message: > xzcat patch-3.2.29.xz | patch -p1 -s -d > /opt/buildtool-master/source/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/linux/linux-3.2 > ln -s > /opt/buildtool-master/source/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/linux/linux-3.2 > linux > cat bitreverse.patch | patch -d > /opt/buildtool-master/source/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/linux/linux-3.2/lib > -p0 > patching file Kconfig > Hunk #1 succeeded at 11 with fuzz 1 (offset 3 lines). > cat kernel-mkmakefile.patch | patch -d > /opt/buildtool-master/source/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/linux/linux-3.2 > -p1 > patching file Makefile > Hunk #1 succeeded at 423 with fuzz 1 (offset 23 lines). > patching file scripts/mkmakefile > cat 620-sched_esfq.patch | patch -d > /opt/buildtool-master/source/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/linux/linux-3.2 > -p1 > patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h > patching file net/sched/Kconfig > patching file net/sched/Makefile > patching file net/sched/sch_esfq.c > cat 621-sched_act_connmark.patch | patch -d > /opt/buildtool-master/source/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/linux/linux-3.2 > -p1 > patching file net/sched/act_connmark.c > patching file net/sched/Kconfig > patching file net/sched/Makefile > mkdir -p > /opt/buildtool-master/toolchain/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/usr > touch .source > (for i in ; do \ > patch -i Bering-3.2.29.config-$i.patch -o Bering-3.2.29.config-$i > Bering-3.2.29.config&& \ > mkdir -p linux-$i&& cp Bering-3.2.29.config-$i linux-$i/.config&& \ > ARCH= make -C > /opt/buildtool-master/source/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/linux/linux-3.2 > O=../linux-$i oldconfig || \ > exit 1; done ; \ > ARCH= make -C linux-$i include/linux/version.h headers_install&& \ > cp -r linux-$i/usr/include > /opt/buildtool-master/toolchain/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi.mk/usr) > make: Entering an unknown directory > make: *** linux-: No such file or directory. Stop. > make: Leaving an unknown directory > > As cross-platform compilation is one of our main targets for the 5.x > series IMHO this is a showstopper for the alpha version. > Maybe someone has a quick solution/idea how to fix this - at least it > worked some time ago :) > > > As major tasks after the release of an alpha version I see: > > 1) providing (an) image(s) for other platforms > 2) improvements to the build/release process to alleviate support for > other platforms > 3) Adjust/cleanup the wiki for the 5.x series - that means to keep the > developer guide in sync with the changes since 4.x, to review and copy > (and update, where necessary) the 4.x User Guide to 5.x User Guide > 4) Work on the webpage (probably in sync with moving to a new CMS). > > Do I have missed something, other opinions, anything else...??? > > kp > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > _______________________________________________ > leaf-devel mailing list > leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
