Le 26 déc. 2012 à 00:01, KP Kirchdoerfer <kap...@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit 
:

> Hi;
> 
> sorry for the delay - I started the discussion and then went offline :(
> 
> Am 21.12.2012 10:21, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
>> 
>> Le 19 déc. 2012 à 17:46, KP Kirchdoerfer <kap...@users.sourceforge.net> a 
>> écrit :
>> 
>>> Hi Gents;
>>> 
>>> I'd like to make a proposal for the timeframe and features of the second
>>> alpha version of 5.0.
>>> 
>>> First of all, I think it should still be an alpha version - so neither
>>> the kernel nor the uClibc are fixed.
>>> 
>>> Also the major goal for 5.0 to support other cpu architectures misses at
>>> least one image/example.
>>> 
>>> We saw over 100 downloads of alpha1 and received no complaints so far,
>>> so I consider for X86_32 even an alpha1 version was not bad.
>>> 
>>> Along with usual Package updates and fixes, the new features for the
>>> second alpha could be a X86_64 image and to "enable" zram support at
>>> least, and eventually offering signed packages.
>>> 
>>> As far as I'm aware a X86_64 version currently needs
>>> - a patch for vsftpd
>>> - a solution for the uClibc loader (lib/ld-uClibc-0.9.33.2.so vs
>>> lib/ld64-uClibc-0.9.33.2.so
>>> - and images (AFAIR it worked without changes)
>> 
>> About the uClibc shared library, i've already start to discuss about this 
>> with Andrew. Look at the messages with x86_64 toolchain subject.
>> Actually we are 2 solutions:
>> * Patch the toolchain so the library will always be: /lib/ld-uClibc.so
>> * Add a variable and put the right name for every toolchains
> 
> Ouch, I missed that part in the thread, just read the stuff about the
> compilation with gcc. Reread, and my vote goes for option 2.

Option 2 is: use a variable in every toolchain ?

Andrew was talking also to create symlinks.

> 
> 
>>> 
>>> About zram support, I've lost track about it's status.
>>> I know some changes has been made in master (like swap support in the
>>> kernel), others seems to be merged into next branch (like changes to
>>> conf/images/common/leaf.cfg) - don't know what other changes ended in
>>> which repository..., and finally it lacks any documentation how to
>>> enable and to make use of it.
>> 
>> The zram support is in the topic branch: buc5-zram-support
>> 
>> This branch as been merged in next but not in master. If we decided to 
>> integrate it, we only have to merge the topic branch into master.
>> 
>> For the configuration there are a new variable: zswap_size that can be 
>> defined in leaf.cfg.
>> The values can be: 
>>      -1 = disabled
>>      0  = auto
>>      other = size of sram swap partition
>> 
>> Default is -1, but for our images i fixed it to 0 (in 
>> conf/image/common/config.cfg)
> 
> I'd like to integrate it now - if disabled it won't cause any harm, when
> enabling it, it (hopefully) just works and we'll have the chance to get
> feedback.
> 
> If we agree, can you pls merge the topic branch into master?

Branch buc5-zram-support merged info master.
next branch was reset to master because now it's the same.
Branch buc5-zram-support deleted.

> I'll try to take of the documentation.

Go ahead :D

Regards,
Yves


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to