20.09.2014 22:16, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Samstag, 20. September 2014, 21:51:47 schrieb Andrew:
>> 20.09.2014 21:40, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Hi;
>>>
>>> I've moved the thread to leaf-devel  - IMHO that's where it belongs to.
>>>
>>> I almost second Andrew - no surprise :)  - it's been a lot easier to
>>> testdrive new kernels with the splitted approach, than before, but YMMV.
>>>
>>> Anyway I ran into two flaws:
>>>
>>> Currently we generate in initrd
>>>
>>> /boot/lib/modules
>>>
>>> Is that still needed?  I can't see, where it's used - on my boxes it's
>>> always empty. Even don't know where/how to populate it...???
>> It seems like it's just pieces from 3.x...
> This is also my impression.
>
>
>>> And it that is all irrelvant today, do we still need the README in
>>> repo/initrd??
>>>
>>>
>>> We also generate
>>>
>>> /boot/etc/modules
>>> (a list of fs-related modules to load during boot)
>>>
>>> when building initrd.
>>>
>>> To me it's confusing to have all the kernel/module related stuff in
>>> initmod, except to make shure they are loaded - which is part of initrd.
>>>
>>> Any objections, if we move that to initmod?
>>>
>>> kp
>> It may be moved to initmod.
> I did some work on this, but untested yet.
>
>> Or it may be leaved as is.
> Doesn't feel good. If we move fwd with eventually adding different modules
> during boot, changing initrd in addition to initmod is not the separation we
> wanted.
>
>> Or even we can
>> compile fs drivers into kernel as static.
> This will blow up the kernel...
There is no difference - will we load all fs modules, or we are linking 
them static. Piece of code migrates from compressed initmod to 
compressed kernel.
>> Or we can try to use module
>> auto-probing on mounting fs. Last way seems to me more likely.
> That would be a great solution :)
> Will you give it a try?
>
> kp
Ok, I'll try.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to