20.08.2015 21:47, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015, 21:25:36 schrieb Andrew:
>> 20.08.2015 20:40, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> HI all;
>>>
>>> maybe we can make a step backwards in this discussion and can think about
>>> my proposal to reduce the pain:
>>>
>>> "The whole pb started here AFAIK:
>>> "Modules that are copied manually, should be saved. Modules that are
>>> loaded from squashfs aren't added to moddb.tgz to reduce it's size."
>>>
>>>
>>> Now we can argue that a user who has enough space for leaving modules.sqfs
>>> on his boot media, will have enough left for a bigger moddb.lrp than
>>> necessary (except those booting from iso image, who can't remove
>>> modules.sqfs).
>>>
>>> There is a case to remove modules.sqfs even beyond space, to speed up boot
>>> time, so autodetection stops immediately due to "missing modules.sqfs".
>>>
>>> So if we go back and never write anything to /var/lib/lrpkg/sqfs.modules
>>> we
>>> can get rid of the changes to update moddb properly, addinga config option
>>> to leaf.cfg  etc...
>>> Andrew,  will there be any other issues related to such a change?"
>> Just slower boot (we should need to unpack 2MB of modules instead of
>> some kb).
> True if the user saves modules and does not delete modules.sqfs.
> IMHO loading from modules.sqfs is  slower than saving modules and delete
> modules.sqfs.
> But if someone is not aware of boot time, there is no need to save modules at
> all.
> The pro would be, that we don't need a new config option.
Somebody may want to use his own precompiled kernel module and don't 
want to waste disk space (for ex., we are still using IDE DOM modules 
32-128M).
In any case, extra config option is better than missed option :)

>> We also may change defaults for UPDATE_MODDB - set it ti true instead of
>> false.
> This is the default right now.
>
> kp
>
>>> kp
>>>
>>> Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015, 17:28:28 schrieb Andrew:
>>>> 19.08.2015 17:24, Erich Titl пишет:
>>>>> Hi Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 19.08.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Andrew:
>>>>>> 19.08.2015 17:13, Erich Titl пишет:
>>>>>>> Hi Andrew
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 19.08.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Andrew:
>>>>>>>> 19.08.2015 17:09, Erich Titl пишет:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrew
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yew and IMHO those modules should be replaced by the ones from either
>>>>>>> moddb or autoprobing.
>>>>>> Why them should be duplicated in moddb? What sense of this?
>>>>> Because they got replaced by a version which may be different.
>>>> 1) they are loaded mostly at boot
>>>> 2) there's no alternative USB & so on drivers (non-kernel), and driver
>>>> for other kernel version will not be loaded.
>>>>
>>>>> As I said, stuff in initmod is _temporary_ to me, just for system
>>>>> boot. If I could, I would even replace the kernel on the fly :-) There
>>>>> is no need to have a recent kernel just to fetch sofware on storage,
>>>>> but YMMV
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> leaf-devel mailing list
> leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to