> OK, this is really not about Dachstein, although that is the > distribution that we're using ;> > > What are the primary differences between dnscache and tinydns ??? http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/dnscache1.html http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/tinydns1.html
> What are the criteria we ought to consider, in deciding which to deploy? Really two different needs. If you only need to access the web dnscache will speed up your requests (that is the "cache" part of it) but it will also make your request more secure. Tinydns is needed if you want to serve the adresses of your domain(s). Basically it will be here a replacement for BIND (in fact BIND combines the dnscache & tinydns function in the same program). But tinydns is much more secure and a LOT LOT smaller (compare size of tinydns.lrp & bind.lrp :-) ) Background material here: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/dnscache6.html Jacques _______________________________________________ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
