Hi Lonnie!

 > Actually was are still a amall company and this particular job if for
 > some friends, a research group the university who has recently had
 > problems, who will not listen to reason about the problems of port-
 > forwarding services like NFS. With that in mind, I told them that I
 > would help get them as secure as possible given their specific
 > requirements.

Sorry, that's what I realized when I rethought about this (ie that it must
have been something not internal to your company...).

BTW, I hope these people are not in CS...

 > Like many people in the academic arena, it will take getting hacked
 > and attacked a few time before they realize that they should have
 > listened to more well informed people in the past, like me, who has
 > tried very hard to get them out of the current mentality of "patch-
 > work" until the next problem.

If these weren't your friends I would almost be tempted to suggest that
you get this in writing that they prefer that solution over a more secure
one (after being informed of the security implications)....  (Some good
ol' CUA...)

 > So, being this, I will simple try to make the best out of what they
 > have and will let get done.

The problem seem to be that NFS doesn't seem to be very firewall friendly...

 > These guys will learn with time I am sure.

For their sake I hope so... (and before they get seriously hacked)

> After making some changes to the firewall and setting up the port-
> forwarding for sunrpc and nfs on udp packets, I am no longer getting
> an RPC time out but now just:
 > mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused

This might seem like a dumb question (and sorry if you mentionned the answer to
this one before, I couldn't find it) but where they communicating with each other
before the firewall was installed?

Anything in the logs?

I haven't "played" with NFS recently but if I had that message I think I would
check if I got the appropriate/relevant entries in hosts.allow & hosts.deny
(ie lines for portmap, lockd, mountd, rquotad & statd).

[The text at the following URL might be useful in getting this right:
<http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2F2001%2Fs1206%2F48s06web%2F48s06web%2Easp>]

(Sorry, this might be two long for the mailing list, you'll probably have to cut & 
paste it...)

> 
> on the client machine when I try to mount the directory.
> 
> The client can been seen on the DNS as well as the server has the
> client IP in its hosts file.

I assumed here that you meant the hosts files and not the hosts.allow & hosts.deny
file, sorry if that was not the case...

> 
> Any ideas from here?
> 

BTW, did you try opening the ports mentionned in the messages I posted? Apparently 
it's not
easy getting them right but I do believe one of the messages actually mentionned a way 
of
finding them out (rpcinfo -p or rpcinfo -p localhost)

I did see a mention at the following URL 
<http://www.io.com/help/linux/NFS-HOWTO-5.html>
(NFS and firewalls) that it might be possible to change the ports used by NFS to some
specific ports but how this is done I unfortunatly don't know (sorry...).

Have a nice day & good luck!

Nick


_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to