Hello everyone, Upon initiating the command "ipsec rsasigkey 1024", I get a "pubkey" format that seems different from that of the examples I gather from the docs. For some reason, perhaps due to this "pubkey" value, I can't establish a successful subnet-to-subnet VPN. Below is a snip of my generated "pubkey" value.
# RSA 1024 bits SR3K-VPN1 Tue Sep 10 11:53:55 2002 # for signatures only, UNSAFE FOR ENCRYPTION #pubkey=0sAQNnQtCrwTIPX9+lBMZuGzaYulXNzFFlZmAC0HVPO19mqJd2Gbt38OLLp/nBFY PyW+p+CKeoIVuWV7nxIZz/KovwQ4gmh3Ec3SUVFuQtRZY+htOWh28m5iaiIsH+w+TCxT3pdL Jq+ScnrpZCOOQUhFaZVHUJB8B4tDbjEO9LMYt8UQ== #IN KEY 0x4200 4 1 AQNnQtCrwTIPX9+lBMZuGzaYulXNzFFlZmAC0HVPO19mqJd2Gbt38OLLp/nBFYPyW+p+CKeo IVuWV7nxIZz/KovwQ4gmh3Ec3SUVFuQtRZY+htOWh28m5iaiIsH+w+TCxT3pdLJq+ScnrpZC OOQUhFaZVHUJB8B4tDbjEO9LMYt8UQ== # (0x4200 = auth-only host-level, 4 = IPSec, 1 = RSA) ...... ...... Is there something wrong with my "pubkey" above? I would also like to send out my lengthy "ipsec barf" result if there's nothing wrong with this "pubkey". TIA - Vic ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html