Hi Pat & List

First let me apologize for the misleading subject, it was late yesterday.

Thanks for the hint, indeed I was able to get a card for trial from D-Link and my old PC did not even want to start anymore. So much for compatibility.

Now I will have to see if some other product performs better.

Anyone, please comment on the routing setup, I am a complete newbie in that field and need a few hints.

Here the original stuff once more

DSL to ISP
|
eth0 dynamic IP
LEAF router/firewall ?? -- wireless --- ?? LEAF router
eth1 192.168.1.1 connection eth1 192.168.2.? subnet 192.168.2.0/24
| |
| (??.??.??.?? possible mobile WLAN station(s)
|
|
subnet1 192.168.1.0/24

Thanks

Erich

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following at 00:42 29.10.2002:
Hey Erich,
 I would be wary of the DWL-520 cards are they require a PCI 2.2 compliant
system, which most "older" (more than a year or two) aren't.
 I ran into this problem and switched it to the Linksys WMP11 card (I
think that's the model) and it worked without a problem.

--Pat

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Erich Titl wrote:

> Hi everybody
>
> Similar questions have been brought up lately so please bear with me.
>
> I am about to build a WLAN connection to a remote subnet which should be
> built up as follows:
>
> DSL to ISP
> |
> |
> eth0 dynamic IP
> LEAF router/firewall    ??.??.??.??    -- wireless


connection --
> ??.??.??.?? LEAF router eth1 192.168.2.? --- subnet 192.168.2.0/24
> 192.168.1.1 |
> | --(??.??.??.?? possible mobile WLAN station)
> |
> subnet1 192.168.1.0/24
>
> Now I am uncertain, what assignment of addresses and routes would be
> reasonable for the wireless connection. Should I treat the wireless
> connection as a separate subnet which I am just using to route through or
> does it make more sense to build a wireless bridge.
>
> Would the set up of the wireless connection using a separate subnet allow
> me to deploy additional mobile WLAN stations in the intermediate subnet.
>
> I would like to use the D-Link DWL-520+ with external antennae as the WLAN
> equipment in the routers, does anyone have experience with this type of
> equipment.
>
> Thanks
>
> Erich
>
> THINK
> P�ntenstrasse 39
> 8143 Stallikon
> mailto:erich.titl@;think.ch
> PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
> SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
THINK
P�ntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:erich.titl@;think.ch
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024  8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to