Thanks for the quick response.

-Youngdo


> ># iptables -nvL
> 
> For future reference, "/sbin/shorewall status" is more useful. I've deleted 
> all of the iptables output since my mailer is folding it but it showed that 
> since you last restarted Shorewall, your firewall had ACCEPTed 14 UDP 
> packets with destination port 137:139 in each direction between the 'loc' 
> zone and the 'fw' zone and no packets between those two zones had dropped 
> into the 'all2all' chain.
> 
> -Tom
> --
> Tom Eastep    \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
> AIM: tmeastep  \ http://shorewall.sf.net
> ICQ: #60745924  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
> Perhaps someone who knows the workings of Samba better than I can comment 
>on whether my suggesting this possibility is useful or silly?
>
>One final suggestion -- you might consider checking the rulesets again 
>(either in this fashion or the one Tom suggested, though I don't know if 
>I'll be able to interpret Shorewall-specific reports) after some time has 
>elapsed, just to be sure that the Samba retransmit failures have actually 
>occurred ... the packet counts in what you posted were generally low, 
>implying that the firewall had not been active for very long, possibly not 
>long enough for the problem to occur.
>
>

N�HY޵隊X���'���u����貇�V+.jT��ب4Dܢjkz��+�u�ޖ�fz{m��[�)m���r���쨺�k�ۜ�+�$�ɧ�y�'�)ކ�-y��Ȩ��a����l���q���z�܂&���v*�r�e�'+�M7zy^i��z���X��X��W�~��X���(��~��zw���i����l���q���z���l�X��)ߣ�^i��z��!���W�~���-��?���v�?v�&jv�z�ݡȝ��u�٥


Reply via email to