Hi folks, 1.) Do I understand it correctly that the latest Bering(s)(Bering-uClibc & Bering) both support NAT traversal? I'm a little confused because of the earlier post entitled "Bering 1.1 and NAT-Traversal" that referred to Alex Rhomberg's LEAF Page at http://leaf-project.org/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=1402&page_id=49 seemed to suggest you might need to do something different if you wanted your Bering box to support traversal.
2.) Is it difficult (or even possible) to connect to a box behind Bering using IPSec? (I have a Windows 2000 Server on my LAN that I would like to securely connect to.) I see that Jacques says "NAT-Traversal patch allows FreeS/WAN to be used behind any NAT device by encapsulating ESP in UDP.", so is it a *better* approach to securely connect to my Bering box (but then how do you "browse" your LAN?), or should I try to connect to the box directly, since FreeS/WAN will now NAT traverse? Thank you for your input! Craig ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
