On Tuesday 23 December 2003 01:31 pm, Trevor-Engele wrote: > I've had some good success with this stuff and have even gone and got > them all set up to run off of those fancy new fangled CF card things. It's > cool, I like it, Ipsec is a wondrous thing now even. In fact you could say > I've almost forsaken BSD......<S> > But I do have a problem and like all problems it can be traced back to > Windows, or maybe more accurately, Windows users. I have two machines on > the local network that I need to foward traffic coming from the internet > to. This in itself is nothing that I haven't done before but what happens > is one of the dnat lines will not work. > I have ommitted large portions of the rules file for shorewall version > 1.4.2 running over iptables 1.2.8 for the sake of brevity: > > DNAT net loc:192.168.2.23 tcp 25 - > 216.123.215.85 > DNAT net loc:192.168.2.50 tcp 3389 - > 216.123.215.85 > DNAT net loc:192.168.2.168 tcp 3389 - > 216.123.216.86 >
Did you mean "216.123.215.86" rather than "216.123.216.86"? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
