Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2004 19:25 schrieb Timothy J. Massey: > Hello! > > What is the future of Bering? Has it been supplanted by Bering-uClibc? > Or will there be future development on "traditional" Bering in parallel?
AFAIK the new project leader for Bering Eric Wolzak still plans some updates for Bering. > I have been using Bering quite successfully for some time now, but I'm > at a spot where it would be good to evaluate a change to uClibc. I > haven't seen any discussion regarding development on Bering. Of course, > most of the development on uClibc has been to recompile existing Bering > packages... :) Either I miss you're irony, or you better reread the Changelog for Bering-uClibc - none of the entries mentions other packages than the one from the base image, and I can assure that recompiling packages has been a minor effort compared to the changes for base image, addition of ipv6 and gaining more space on the base image. But maybe I understand better what you mean with "real future development" if you give some more explanations. As a side-note: There are even a few packages in testing not available for Bering, requested by list-user's, but we had to made the same experience as Jacques - often we doesn't get any feedback (positive or negative) from the user's who requested the package and provided with a test version - so the packages will be in testing forever. Thx for your attention kp ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
