On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, freeman groups wrote: >K.-P. Kirchd�rfer wrote: > >>You may try to compile it yourself - it isn't that hard to set up an >>uClibc environment: >> >>http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=91018&page_id=52 >> >>kp > >Thanks for the suggestion KP but this is w Linux system that I could dump >onto a h/d and boot up. >From there I could probably manage the untarring of code and invoking >'make something-or-other' but it's the initial setup of libraries, >paths, etc, that dissuades me. > >In any case might I ask again for the LEAF community to consider my >request for someone to compile BEEP.LRP since it won't be happening at >my end anytime soon?
I've lately also tried to compile binaries linked against uclibc. I found it too difficult to find out, how to set up a build environment, however I found a very useful toolset: uclibc-toolchain, which is a debian package containing some wrapper scripts around the normal gcc compiler and other stuff. Anyways, with that package and the development uclibc package installed, compiling binaries for uclibc is as easy as normal compilation: 'i386-uclibc-gcc beep.c -o beep' works. I've also built a beep.lrp package based on beep 1.2.2, however I don't know how/where to upload it. So if someone can point this out... Jaap Eldering ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
