Charles Steinkuehler wrote:

Michael McClure wrote:

Charles Steinkuehler wrote:

Michael McClure wrote:

Thanks for the reply. Should I be using a different version/release that would work better for RAID? If so, pls let me know. As far as your info requests, see below.
thanks.
mike.


# lsmod
Module         Pages    Used by
3c59x                  19984   1
pci-scan                2296   0 [3c59x]
raid5                  17664   0 (unused)
raid1                   7916   0 (unused)
raid0                   2768   0 (unused)
ntfs                   39868   0 (unused)
smbfs                  26744   0 (unused)
nfsd                  181896   0 (unused)
nfs                    71452   0 (unused)
lockd                  44392   0 [nfsd nfs]
sunrpc                 60676   0 [nfsd nfs lockd]
ext2                   40548   0 (unused)

toaster: -root-
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid5]
read_ahead not set
unused devices: <none>



OK, so RAID support is in the kernel and you've got the required modules loaded. What about your IDE drive? IIRC, you arn't using one of the kernels with IDE built-in, and it doesn't look like you're loading any IDE modules based on the above.


Can you access the low-level /dev/hdX devices that make up your RAID?

What does "fdisk -l /dev/hdc" and "fdisk -l /dev/hdd" show?

Are you *REALLY* trying to build a RAID5 device with two partitions on the same drive (/dev/hdd1 & /dev/hdd2 in your example raidtab, which go along with /dev/hdc1)? If so, I'm not sure that will work, and it wouldn't be recommended in any case...

I wondered about the kernal in the uname -a, but when I d/l'd the kernal from your website, it was called, linux-2.2.19-3-LEAF-RAID-IDE.zImage.upx. Yet, my uname -a doesn't include IDE.



# fdisk -l /dev/hdc

Disk /dev/hdc: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 8374 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot   Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdc1            1     6242  3145936+  83  Linux native

toaster: -root-
# fdisk -l /dev/hdd

Disk /dev/hdd: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 977 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot   Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdd1            1      392  3148708+  83  Linux native
/dev/hdd2          393      784  3148740   83  Linux native

As far as my raid5 device, I just want to make sure I can get the raid5 working before I buy a 3rd drive. My test set is 1 4gb drive (hdc) and an 8gb drive (hdb). I created 3 partitions each +3072M on the two devices and am trying to build the raid5 test. I also tried to do this with just doing raid1 on /dev/hdc1 and /dev/hdd1 and got the same error on the same command.


OK, you've got raid support in the kernel, and IDE support is working.

There's not a lot else that needs to be there for RAID to work. Did you remember to make the raid devices (ie: does /dev/md0 exist)?

<excerpt http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/Documentation/LRPHardDiskHOWTO.txt>
Check to make sure the /dev directory contains all the devices you
need for your hardware.  You may also need to update
/var/lib/lrpkg/root.dev.mk to create additional device nodes. I added
the following lines on my system to support the newly added RAID
functionality:

  # RAID Devices
  makedevs md b 9 0 0 15 >null 2>&1
</excerpt>


What a bonehead! I totally missed that -- then again, I really don't understand what the command is/means so I'm not sure "missed" is the right word. :-) My ls -l /dev/md* returns no rows so there's the problem. Once I did this, I was able to run my mkraid, mke2fs and mount.


Thanks, Charles.  You are the Man!

Actually - Thanks to all of you LEAF developers/contributors. I started using LRP w/the first version of eigerstein, and used to follow the list back before the big fallout with lrp. The names are remember from years ago: Charles -- I never did catch you on Robot Wars :-( ; Jack Coates and MonkeyNoodle for dinner, Tom Eastep, Ray Olszewski, Jeff Newmiller, Mike Noyes, George Metz, Matt Schalit, and even Dave Cinege inspired people to participate. I know I answered a few questions when I could, but alas, I'm not a developer, so I cannot contribute at the level I'd like to. I have been amazed at your dedication to the betterment of the community and appreciated when those of you who did took a stand to keep LRP pure and out of politics. I've watched the development of all the branches and saw new names take on leadership roles (David Douthitt, Jacques Nilo, Eric Wolzak, and so many others)...I very much appreciate that all of you take time out of your lives to develop this product and to teach us how to use it.

Thanks.
mike.

PS -- I know I probably messed up my little trip down "Name Memory Lane" in that some people probably got involved before others, etc -- it's just how I remember things (or my email does) ;-) That being said, please know that any and all mentors on this list, regardless of when they started contributing, have my utmost thanks.














-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to