Cpu,

>Eric,
>
>It looks like it's trying to load /lib/ipsec/ipsec (the shell 
>script).
>Does insmod default to the current directory? Perhaps the ipsec 
>scripts
>are being run from within /lib/ipsec.

No insmod shouldn't default to the current directory, just tested it 
myself and ipsec is loaded by the ipsec script without problems.

About the 'if test ! -f $ipsecversion' tested multiple times: first 
it tries just to insmod it (which should work, see above), if that 
fails it tests if the kernel is modulair and tries to insmod it from 
within the modules directory and finally if that doesn't work it 
exits. The test is just to see if ipsec is loaded.

>Everywhere else it loads fine:
>
>foobar# insmod ipsec
>Using /lib/modules/ipsec.o
>
>Here are some of the changes I've made:
>
>- added USB keyboard support: input.o/hid.o/keybdev.o
>
>- NTFS, UDF support. All modules. I also splurrged on NCP support
>
>- changed the processor to VIA-C3-2 (not too useful right now, but a
>  backport of the PadLock cryptography engine to 2.4.x is around
>  the corner, figured I'd kick the tires around).
>
>- selected "Video mode selection support" in console drivers so I 
>can
>
>  choose different text modes (vga=x in syslinux.cfg 80x30,  
>etc...).
>
>
>That's about it for the kernel. Maybe a couple of other things.
>
>I also did a lot of package consolidation. Basically, I rollup 
>several
>packages in one (where it seems appropriate). Now that I think 
>about, I
>never did build etc.lrp using buildtool...still using etc from 
>2.2.2,
>could that be a problem? I will go ahead and test using the official
>builds regardless, if this really seems like a problem on my end.
>Despite this, everything appears to be working okay. -cpu

Using the 2.2.2 etc file shouldn't be the problem, but merging and 
changing packages could very well be a problem. The packages are 
carefully tuned to be correct (f.e. for backup) and contents. 
Changing that kind of things can easely lead to strange problems, 
like it appears with ipsec. 

Also changing processor type without recompiling kernel related 
packages or modules could lead to problems (if not done absolutely 
right).

You should know exactly what you are doing when changing kernel setup 
and packages, a lot of things are thightly coupled.

Eric


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to