Hi KP Am 29.10.2014 um 19:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am 29.10.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Erich Titl: >>> Hi >>> ...
>
>> In order to make leaf a bit more lean I vote for dropping this package
>> and addding local.local to another package.
>
> I think you've spotted a bug in building images - I can't see a need to
> rework the logic behind, at least it won't make it easier to save locally
> added files provding it within another package.
I don't think so
local.local could easily be placed in config.lrp and adding `local`
automagically to the package list is really trivial.
From that very moment local.lrp would be about as important as a third leg.
Else it might be possible to just drop /var/lib/lrpkg/packages
altogether as it is completely redundant. Searching *.local in
/var/lib/lrpkg would be more flexible and possibly safer.
At the same time we could also get rid of constructs like this inside apkg
package_part () {
local F=${1##*/}
F=${F%%.lrp}
echo $F
}
and replace them with shell built in functions like
package_part () {
basename $1 .lrp
}
Even better, we could drop the function package_part and make apkg lean
and mean (and there are more of these constructs)
It will make the shell scripts a lot more legible, smaller, safer and
faster.
cheers
Erich
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
