On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:13:25PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > > I agree with your requirements 2,3,4 and I note that UTC doesn't satisfy > 3, which is another statement of this timeless predictability requirement. > (Your requirement 4 is only relatively timeless, since it allows for > changes in the definition of the second.)
Have there been suggestions, indeed, for such a predictable SI-second-based calendar that synchronizes with the Earth's rotation? _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
