"UTC is derived from TAI" Type that phrase into google and look at the results, from IERS, ITU, G. Petit, E.F. Arias, wikipedia These deserve to be treated as authoritative sources.
But isn't it the case that hidden in that phrase is something that deserves a great deal of explanation? There is only one TAI, and it comes next month from BIPM Circular T. There are many UTCs. Therefore the UTC that this phrase refers to can only be the undecorated, true, just plain "UTC" which is also not known until next month from Circular T. As a practical matter, TAI is derived from all the various versions of UTC(k) which are maintained by the contributing national labs. So the only UTC which is available right now is one of the various versions of UTC(k), not just plain UTC. I suppose this is all just part of the explanation of why the general notion of precision time scales is so poorly understood. -- Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
