> But I took
> some numbers from the Williams paper that was cited and played with them in
> a spreadsheet. These suggest that about 90% of the terrestrial rotational
> angular momentum reappears as lunar orbital angular momentum. On the other
> hand, I can't see where the rest of it would go - apparently observations
> show no indication that the Earth's orbit is growing.

I've also just realized that the numbers are within the range of
experimental error. I get the following angular momenta out of
Williams:

               Earth    Moon    Total
2450 My ago    7450    27500    34950
 900 My ago    6730    28100    34830
 620 My ago    6400    28400    34800
        Now    5840    28900    34740

That's a total loss of under 1%. Some of the source numbers are +/-3%, and
no doubt there are rounding errors in my calculations.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather          | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: cl...@davros.org     | it will get its revenge.
Web: http://www.davros.org  |   - Henry Spencer
Mobile: +44 7973 377646
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to