On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Tom Van Baak wrote: >> Eyeballing it says around a couple of milliseconds, which, unless >> you have done things to your hardware, is lost in the NTP noise. > > That was my conclusion too. It's one thing to work with hardware > at the micro- nano- or picosecond level. But the threshold with > PC's, even PC's running NTP, is so relaxed that I figured almost > any hack that uses a dut1 database would do the trick. The one > I usually fetch is http://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/ser7.dat. > > Yesterday DUT1 was -0.30806, today is -0.30862, and tomorrow > will be -0.30937. So it seems to me you could implement the > google ntp server lie() function with essentially one line of code > and it would be accurate to better than 1 ms. No interpolation, > no filtering, no prediction; just a table lookup. Hard to beat that > performance/simplicity ratio.
Yea, the hard part is keeping that table up to date, but I guess that's the job of a crontab entry not ntpd itself. Warner _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs