I've been reminded of this contribution to the 2003 Torino meeting: http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/torino/seago.pdf
Don't know where it falls on the stuff-o-meter, but at 16 pages and with 33 references it seems "actual" enough. This is a simulated email, however. Rob -- On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Rob Seaman wrote: > "Actual stuff"? There's a whole other sermon… > > These are tools for characterizing an "actual effect" in the "actual sky" > that will affect "actual operations" of the Air Force Space Command. > > The proceedings are being finalized and should be available next week. In > the mean time feel free to read through the other presentations at: > > http://futureofutc.org/ > > Extra credit if you can locate the sundial on Mars. > > Rob > -- > On Nov 17, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > >> Rob Seaman <sea...@noao.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> Can you (or another participant) give me some concrete examples of >>>> stuff that needs leap seconds and don't already have well established >>>> mechanisms for adjusting the time output from their GPS or other time >>>> keeping equipment appropriately? >>> >>> See >>> http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/futureofutc/program/presentations/AAS_11-674_Storz.pptx.pdf >> >> That describes simulations, not actual stuff. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs