On 5 Jan 2012, at 23:49, Rob Seaman wrote:

> Tony Finch wrote:
> 
>> I reckon the timezone fudge is workable for rate errors as large as 1e-5,
>> which would imply a timezone change every 11 years.
>> 
>> More speculation along these lines: http://fanf.livejournal.com/116480.html
> 
> And I have reckoned the exact opposite.  A leap hour or timezone shift per 
> decade is way too frequent for people to put up with. 

Why not?  They handle DST shifts every six months.  What's the difference for 
99% of the population?

ian

_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to