On Wed 2012-01-18T18:42:03 +0000, Tony Finch hath writ: > Actually, no, because what the RGO called GMT and what they disseminated > as the official British civil time was the same as UTC from 1972. I expect > a court would take this as indicating that "GMT" should be interpreted as > "what the duly appointed authority (then the RGO, now the NPL) declares to > be the official time".
Duly appointed authority seems to think leap seconds are important for official time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heeG4ULJLSI -- Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
