On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:41 AM, mike cook wrote: > Le 06/03/2012 03:42, Steve Allen a écrit : >> >> >> Note with great amusement that radio regulation 2.5 defines the >> concept of UTC date using terminology directly derived from the >> rotation of the earth. (What other option is there?) > Thanks for the references Steve. I that note with some dismay, but no > surprise, that recommendation COM/60 includes in the invitation to WRC15 > "whether by the modification of UTC " which could lead to another stalemate, > but with delight that no reference to UTC was included in that to ITUR, > leaving the possibility of de-connecting a future continuous time scale. > > Is anyone taking bets on the resolution of the conflict in 2015?
I'll put a fiver on "refer for further study" but without the sound and fury of this go round. Warner
_______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
