A piece of history from the JPL DSN operations
http://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report2/VIII/VIIIT.PDF
gives a view into the level of nomenclature confusion that happened
around 1972.  At that date no CCIR document had used the term "UTC".

Not only does it use "old UTC" and "new UTC", but it also
makes "new UTC" synonymous with "IAT" and "A.1", and to
the relevant precision all of them interchanged with "GMT".

There is also the interesting assertion that in the US the NBS was
responsible for frequency and USNO was responsible for time.

--
Steve Allen                 <s...@ucolick.org>                WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB   Natural Sciences II, Room 165    Lat  +36.99855
1156 High Street            Voice: +1 831 459 3046           Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064        http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/     Hgt +250 m
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to