Steve Allen said:
> If without leap seconds the ITU-R regulations and recommendations
> become self-inconsistent then an unfortunate event happening within
> the day-long ambiguous interval coinciding with a change of insurance
> policies could be deemed to be covered by none, one, or both policies.
> In that case "sane" falls victim to "corporate responsibility to the
> shareholder" of insurers and insured.  Lawsuits seem inevitable.

We figured out how to fix that in 1750 (see 24 Geo.2 c.23 s.6).

You may now stop panicking.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather          | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: cl...@davros.org     | it will get its revenge.
Web: http://www.davros.org  |   - Henry Spencer
Mobile: +44 7973 377646
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to