Brooks Harris said: > tm_sec + tm_min*60 + tm_hour*3600 + tm_yday*86400 + > (tm_year???70)*31536000 + ((tm_year???69)/4)*86400 ??? > ((tm_year???1)/100)*86400 + ((tm_year+299)/400)*86400 > > This is an *uncompensated-for-leap-seconds* Gregorian calendar counting > scheme with an artificially imposed "1970" ("the Epoch") "origin". I > like to call it the 1970 *barrier*.
Why is it a barrier? Nothing prevents tm_year being negative; indeed, it's a signed type. > But, CAUTION - not all implementations of gmtime() are equally good. > I've compiled and tested many versions from the open-source community > and many have smoking gun errors. Outright bugs don't help confidence in > consistent implementation and contribute to the confusion. And that's *without* having to test for an event that only happens every year or two. Which is why software engineers (among others) would like to get rid of leap seconds. >> Maybe the way forward would be to introduce a new >> "elapsedtime_t" type that really does count seconds since the Epoch (to >> be used in any applications that require duration) and to deprecate >> arithmetic on time_t values (which is problematic around leap seconds). > > Yes, generally. Getting ANSI c and POSIX standards bodies to change > their ways is an uphill battle. When I was on the ISO C (*NOT* "ANSI c") committee, we looked at the issue. Then we asked the expert community (that is, you lot), to come up with a consensus proposal that we could look at. As far as I know, the committee is still waiting. (I *did* get the double leap second error removed from ISO C, meaning it vanished from POSIX as well. Everyone agreed that this had been a simple misunderstanding of something back when the first version of the C Standard was being written.) -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: cl...@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646 _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs